Elon Musk, head of the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), has called for a “wave of judicial impeachments” following recent court decisions that have impeded initiatives by the Trump administration. Musk’s remarks were made on his social media platform, X, in response to a ruling by U.S. District Judge John Bates. Judge Bates ordered the restoration of federal health datasets that had been removed, a decision Musk criticized, alleging a conflict of interest.
REUTERS
This ruling came after President Donald Trump issued an executive order banning the promotion of “gender ideology” by the government. Judge Bates sided with Doctors for America, a progressive physicians’ group, which argued that the removal of the datasets violated federal law.
REUTERS
In a separate case, Musk advocated for the impeachment of another federal judge who temporarily blocked DOGE’s access to Treasury Department data. U.S. District Judge Paul Engelmayer issued a preliminary injunction preventing DOGE from accessing Treasury records containing personal financial information of millions of Americans. The order also mandated that DOGE destroy any such records it had acquired since January 20.
NEWSWEEK
President Trump has expressed frustration with these judicial decisions, particularly those hindering DOGE’s efforts to identify and eliminate government inefficiencies. On his Truth Social platform, he questioned the rationale behind court orders that, in his view, compel the government to make payments despite evidence of fraud and waste.
AP NEWS
In response to these developments, some Republican lawmakers are taking action. Representative Eli Crane of Arizona announced that he has drafted articles of impeachment against Judge Engelmayer, accusing him of obstructing DOGE’s mandate by blocking access to essential Treasury Department systems.
REUTERS
In a related matter, Federal Election Commission (FEC) Chairwoman Ellen Weintraub is resisting an attempt by President Trump to remove her from her position. Weintraub, who has served on the FEC since 2002, received a letter from the President dated January 31, informing her of her termination. She has publicly challenged the legality of this action, stating that there is a lawful procedure for replacing FEC commissioners, which she asserts was not followed in this instance.
POLITICO
These events underscore the escalating tensions between the executive branch and the judiciary, as well as independent federal agencies, as the Trump administration seeks to advance its policy agenda.
